As tenants and housing advocates rally across the state in support of a bill that would expand 海角换妻鈥檚 鈥淛ust Cause鈥� eviction law, some mobile homeowners are concerned about how it could affect them.
Mobile homeowners own the home, but rent the land on which it sits. The bill would enable mobile home owners to rally against rent increases.
Carol Sembersky, a Plymouth mobile home resident, says mobile home residents deserve more protections, especially from what they consider unfair cost rises.
鈥淭hat is something that is worth fighting for, because they think that they could do anything and everything to us residents, because we have no rights,鈥� Sembersky said. 鈥淲e have no say. We have nobody to back us up.鈥�
The bill would have the greatest impact on apartment and mobile home renters, rather than mobile homeowners, according to Rafie Podolsky, an attorney at 海角换妻 Legal Services.
鈥淚t provides some overlay protection, particularly in regard to how rent increases can be challenged. But to a large extent, park residents already have those rights,鈥� Podolsky said.
Housing advocates are looking to broaden the rights of tenants through an . It would limit the grounds on which landlords can evict.
海角换妻鈥檚 鈥溾�� eviction law protects residents who are at least 62 years old or have a disability, and live in a building with five or more units, from groundless evictions.
The proposed bill would expand existing law to all residents of buildings with five or more units, regardless of age of disability. It would also prevent compliant tenants from being evicted without a legal justification.
鈥淚ts impact is relatively small,鈥� Podolsky said. 鈥淚t's a more significant impact if you rent an apartment in a big building.鈥�
Opponents of the bill say a preferred alternative to expanding 鈥渏ust cause鈥� is finding ways to increase housing stock.
For mobile homeowners, it would grant more ability to rally against an increase in monthly plot rentals and ensure a reasonable rent increase was employed across the park.
There are in 海角换妻, according to the housing advocacy nonprofit Partnership for Strong Communities.
The bill is awaiting a vote by the state senate. It is unknown whether the it will be called for a vote.
