海角换妻 lawmakers are considering a number of election reforms to strengthen absentee ballot oversight and security.
The proposed reforms, which were discussed in a public hearing on Monday, come following a series of mayoral elections in Bridgeport marred by accusations of ballot fraud.
The accusations attracted national attention and resulted in a judge ordering a redo of the Democratic primary in the state鈥檚 biggest city. Incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim eventually defeated challenger John Gomes.
But concerns over the integrity of the election remain, with Secretary of the State Stephanie Thomas Friday her office made multiple referrals to the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) surrounding possible violations in the city鈥檚 most recent mayoral-do over election last month.
Now, Thomas is supporting two bills to close loopholes in state law, to better monitor potential voting irregularities, even if they are relatively rare, as .
鈥淚 want the people of 海角换妻 to know that overall, my confidence in 海角换妻鈥檚 elections is very strong,鈥� Thomas told members of the Government Administration and Elections Committee. 鈥淏ut like any system, it can always be tweaked to make it more efficient, more secure.鈥�
would mandate video surveillance at ballot boxes and limit replacement absentee ballots to only the applicant.
would establish a 17-person group of local and state officials, and citizens, which could provide towns training or monitor elections when necessary.
State Sen. Robert Sampson, a Republican ranking member of the Government Administration and Elections Committee, said the proposal doesn鈥檛 go far enough to address absentee ballot security issues. Other top GOP lawmakers in the state over election integrity, and need for reform.
Last week鈥檚 batch of referrals to the SEEC details Bridgeport voters allegedly receiving absentee ballots even though they didn鈥檛 apply for one, and an unknown individual seen dropping multiple ballots in two drop boxes.
Thomas said the reforms would help to address election security, without curbing someone鈥檚 ability to vote.
鈥淲e are at risk, I think, of over-correcting and disenfranchising the vast majority of voters based on a few bad actors,鈥� Thomas said.
